ScheduledSocial impactstandardSolo or team
Common Good
Build something for a community organization that could not afford to commission it.
Social impact challenge. Judges weight usefulness heavily and are explicitly instructed to discount projects that overstate their impact.
Build window opens in
--:--:--- Build time
- 30 minutes
- Host
- Tomas Eriksen
- Judges
- 3 on the panel
- Voting
- Community vote enabled
The brief
Required deliverables
Deliverables
- Working demo
- Repository
- Video
- Honest limitations section
Rules
- Limitations section is mandatory.
- No overstated impact claims.
Judging
Standard Daily Rubric
The default rubric for daily challenges. Weights are tuned so that a working, honest, well-explained build beats an ambitious broken one.
| OriginalityIs the idea fresh, or a well-worn demo with a new coat of paint? | 15% |
| ExecutionDoes it actually run? How much of the promise is real? | 20% |
| UsefulnessWould a real person use this? Is the problem worth solving? | 15% |
| Technical QualitySound architecture and sensible tradeoffs for a 30-minute build. | 12% |
| Design & UXClarity, polish, and accessibility of the interface. | 12% |
| Effective Use of AIIs AI load-bearing here, or decorative? | 13% |
| Completion in TimeHow much shipped inside the clock, per the disclosure fields. | 8% |
| Demo & PresentationDid the live demo land? Was the process explained well? | 5% |