Week One
Generates a personalized onboarding checklist by diffing your skills against the repo. Built for Pair Programmer's Apprentice โ use lumen forge to build a tool for developers who are new to a codebase. Checklist generation and progress tracking. The interface is deliberately narrow: one path, done properly, rather than a broad surface that half-works at the deadline.
Gallery
Screens
Week One โ main view
Week One โ result state
On the clock
What shipped, what didn't
Completed in time
Checklist generation and progress tracking.
Unfinished / faked
Skills come from a manual form, not your commit history.
Obstacles
The first approach needed a background worker I didn't have time to deploy, so I moved it inline at minute 14.
Lessons learned
Writing the submission summary first would have caught the scope problem earlier.
Process
Prompting approach
Started from a single system prompt describing the user and their constraint, then iterated with the assistant on the Week One data model before writing any interface code. Full prompt log is in the repository under /prompts.
Fairness
Disclosures
Declared by the builder at submission time, visible to judges before scoring.
Reused a personal utility file for date formatting (~40 lines), linked in the repo README.
Judging
Public feedback
Judges' private notes stay private โ this is what they chose to say publicly.
Elena Voss
VP of Engineering, Harbor Compute
The idea is strong and the execution is most of the way there. The demo path broke once, which is what separates this from the top three today.
Marcus Bell
Founder, Bellwether Studio
Solid build with a clear user in mind. The interface is doing less than it could โ a second pass on hierarchy would lift this considerably.
Hana Kobayashi
Principal Research Engineer, Independent
Good instinct on the problem. I would have liked to see the model doing more of the reasoning rather than formatting output.
Discussion
0 comments
No comments yet.